The idea of this blog is to enable free flow of opinions regarding various companies, companies that you work for or have an opinion on.

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Apple

Apple is a cool company with cool products. The Mac has die hard followers - true believers. But they are few and far between.
Here's an interesting stat:
13% PC market share in 1993
2.7% PC Market share in 2004
Yeah, Macs are used heavily in ad agencies, print industry and in the creative industry.But that
really doesn't account for much.
With their PC prices at such high levels ($800 and above), they still consider themselves a premium brand. The fact that most software runs on Windows doesn't help them much either.
There is a crisis on hand however, Macs are dying and the PC segment needs to be seriously reworked.
Apple however has moved very smartly into the entertainment segment with the iPod. The iPods rock. With the largest market share in this segment they are perfectly poised for growth
of music and video content delivery on the net.
Will this be their future growth ? Will they get completely out of the PC industry and move completely and smoothly over to the entertainment segment.

Most companies that do not concentrate on their core business, irrespective of their innovations, cannot sustain themselves for future growth.

What do u think ?

15 Comments:

Blogger Shanti Mangala said...

I disagree about the IPod. Apple's big thing has been that their products "look" cool. Apart from the cool factor, most people also care about "functionality" and "bang-for-the-buck". Why pay for a 20-GB IPod when I can a 40-GB MP3 player at the same price with a different brand?

Usability is another problem I have with Apple as in ITunes. I'd rather pay MSN Music the money and download songs that I can upload onto any player I have instead of buying from ITunes and becoming a prisoner of the brand since ITunes will not let me upload to any other MP3 players except the IPod?

1:10 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

True, but ipod has captured the imagination of the users. Only time will tell. Steve Jobs will make sure that you use the iPod for everything. He will stay one step ahead of the competition.
Being a prisoner of a brand can be hell if it isn't Apple ;-)

10:06 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

iPod..iPod..iPod..i am sick of reading and hearing about this thing. There are better products out there if u really bothered to look

10:17 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

guys..chill...
iPod has changed the world and will continue to do so..there are more exciting things on the way.
This will become a device that would be used for a range of things. Haven't we all dreamed of having one device that does many things. Well..here it is ..the iPod. Slowly but surely you will have your life in your palms and ears..
The possibilities are endless.

10:20 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

iPod has captured the imagination of the people. They are nicely priced as well making it available to all strata of people. I like their dial. That was innovative...Apple style....
Hope it doesn't die the death similar to the Mac..
Steve ..are u listening...

10:46 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that the industry Apple is in, is called by Economists as 'Monopolistic competition'. (Let me explain what it means before I forget what it means - It is an industry where there are too many players, so your margin is too low or your volume is too low. The only way to survive and be profitable is to continuously innovate and keep having the first mover advantage).
IPod truly started a great revolution in music listening. Now the videos as well. It was a great advantage for Apple, as their revenue figures indicated. But I doubt if they are going to be able to keep up with that just with the help of IPod. The other day I went to CompUSA I saw a very nice MP3 player 20GB for $99, it can record my voice, it can store other regular files so I could transport them also, and it could even clean the dishes for me. Sorry the last one is just in my wanted features list.

Mr. A.C was saying earlier today about a very nice mp3 player shiny etc, but that everybody only wants IPod. This is one point which might play into Apple's favor, like how A&Fitch could lure the youth to brand its ware. Again, I think that it would be hard for Apple to keep up with just the IPod in the long run - low price competitors are already eating its share. I would agree that it is good for us consumers if Apple keeps at it with great new products.

11:01 PM

 
Blogger Shanti Mangala said...

Raghu,

you got the point I was trying to make. My husband wanted to buy me an IPod. I was not really interested in the size or the looks of the MP3 player - all I cared about was that the MP3 player play music well and have enough capacity to hold all my music (roughly 20+GB at the point). It was a simple thing for me to choose a Creative Zen over the IPod, as it gave me more bang for my buck.

Similarly, most tech-savvy kids these days are not just buying from ITunes, they are also buying from sites like allofmp3.com that offer the latest downloads for pennies (literally two cents/MB) - why would they want an IPod that they cannot use with any other service but ITunes?

Also, we need to think that when kids see us old-fogeys (the 30-something-generation) flashing the IPods, will they still think it is cool?

2:00 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So..lets break it down..

You might get more bang for buck by going in for another player..
The fact remains that its cool...
BMW vs Acura situation.
Its cooler to have a BMW than an Acura.

2nd part...you can still get ur mp3s from elsewhere and use iTunes to load it into iPod. iTunes is the conveyer. Thats it..the source of an mp3 can be from anywhere.

3rd point - that is what i found most interesting and am probably not in a position to answer..will kids find it cool to use if over 30s are using it..good question..
And that is where Steve jumps in..
He will make it a cellphone, podcasting, music playing, game playing, Organizing and potentially critical information holding device that would cater to various segments of the population.

4:50 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Steve Jobs Controls the Universe"

Its more than just an ipod....

Steve Jobs wants to sit in your couch....

To read more, click the link below....

http://yahoo.smartmoney.com/Techsmart/index.cfm?story=20051208&afl=yahoo

9:24 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Shanti, I too would not care to spend big bucks just to be able to display my mp3 device.
Steve, I think car is a different issue - I am not much into cars, but with cars there is so much differentiation to consider, hard to figure out the value for the money, quality issues, resale value, whether you have to take a longer or shorter route to the mountain and so on. With mp3 players, if you are able to decipher a good quality sound then there are just too many choices with big price differences.
It is definitely considered cool by many to show and talk about iPod. I am with you on that Steve, and with the anonymous arbitrator, dreamer, and that woman who came to the CompUSA store that day straight to the man selling the ipod, got the iPod, the iPod Safety (warranty!), the accessories, and just went home.
But would I buy iPod? No. I can get much more bang for the buck with the other equivalent products. The x and y gen would go for the iPod, but I wonder how many college-going students consider it hep to get the iPod even if spending more...

9:44 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ganesh, the url you provided is not fully visible, could you type the part starting from /steve?

9:48 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hear that Apple is starting to leverage the revival in its brand due to the iPod in the PC market. After using and linking iPod/iTunes, people are starting to explore iMacs/iBooks as well. I get to see the Macs on the best seller lists on Amazon. I don't have any numbers, but I am sure that Apple is hoping that iPod will help them do more than just conquer the digital music market.

11:53 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Raghu Seems like the URL is quite alright I was able to use it.

2:18 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The iPod has captured the eye of the users like no other MP3 player has.I have a mini and I am already drooling over the nano.

The pod has ease-of-use like no other player. I've had a rio player as well as a creative player (that I returned), dinking around trying to get that crap to work was not worth the money I would save. The iPod rocks!!

Companies that can reinvent themselves are the ones that will survive. You sustain the core business till you move into the next big area of growth.

10:39 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have been having a problem with the iPod iTrip (Griffin Tech)

Anybody else with the same..before..all the naysayers jump..and say aha..there u go..

nope i still love this thing..

Looking into the video ipod now ;-)

12:53 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, November 24, 2005

GM

Inspite of its "employee discount" program that it ran thru' most of summer, GM finds itself down in the dumps. With over 30000 workers getting cut and the closing of more
than 9 plants, GM suggests that such measures are necessary to get production in line with
demand. Ironically, Toyota on the other hand, is not able to meet demand.
Has GM lost it ? Can it recover ? Its US sales are lagging, but does it have an international
plan that will aid it in its recovery ?

Your thoughts please...

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

GM quality sucks big time. I mean, if u are die hard american and believe that u should buy only american products, then this one is for u. Otherwise, quality wise these guys stink. No amount of sales strategy is going to get them out of their basic flaw - Bad Quality products. Japanese cars get built out of the US too. How come their cars don't suck as much

10:09 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not into cars, so I am not sure about the reasons for GM's woos.
The other day I was seeing a very old video about how Toyota chief learned the car-making business from Ford and went to Japan to build the cars in an entirely different way - by building the quality into the making rather than keeping it as the last step of the process; by treating people as intelligent contributors rather than as monotonous tighteners of the nuts and bolts (like in that Charlie Chaplin movie.. was it Modern Times?). Of course, the american manufacturers also have come a long way on that.
For GM, it might do better by concentrating on the following:
1. Work on getting better ratings on crash testing, safety features, etc., so that its name shows up, somewhere.
2. Produce cars that the owners can be proud of.
3. Establish awareness about GM's key strengths or niche.
Again, I am not much in to cars, so I may be way off here, or GM might call me for further consultation.

12:04 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Walmart

We all know Walmart to be a discount store chain where products can be bought at bargain prices. But, guess what ? Go to walmart.com and check out the engagement ring prices..
(okay i followed a website that asked me to do it..)..$9988..yes...you read that right..
nine thousand nine hundred and eighty eight... whats up Walmart ?
Getting spiffy ?

5 Comments:

Blogger Shanti Mangala said...

I think Walmart has been trying to "designer-up" their stores ala Target for a while now, except they haven't been very successful shedding their cheap image per a TIME article I read recently.

1:12 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Recently a WalMart executive called for an increase in the minimum wage. Reason given was that the customers were not able to afford other purchases given the increase in gas prices. You can imagine that WalMart is depending on the lower and middle income people as their key source of customers.

WalMart can do business as EDLP (Every Day Low Price) or as Hi-Lo pricing (Usually high, but sell low by promotions).
I guess WalMart is trying to implement the Hi-Lo through its online service. It is going to be very hard for a high income level customer to say to others that they bought the engagement ring at WalMart.com, especially to the (hopefully) eager recipient.
WalMart could instead create a separate web-site/brand under which they could sell the niche items. With heavy marketing and numbing the consumers with the new image for the new brand/store, they might be able to succeed in their attempt.

11:45 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recently discovered that Walmart combined with Sam's Club is the biggest seller of diamonds in the US!

Walmart is definitely trying to lure in more of the higher income people to its stores/website. Yesterday, I saw a WM TV ad and it looked more like a Macy's ad! Apparently, they had recently hired a guy from Target to help them improve the layout of the stores. I haven't visited a Walmart recently, so I am not sure if the stores look any different from what they used to.

BTW, on a different note, has anybody seen the "Will Jesus shop at Walmart" campaign? I am totally sick and tired on the anti-Walmart lobbyists.

12:09 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recall reading, the consumer profile for the warehouse stores - like Sam's club and Costco, are predominantly people with a higher than average income, so the ring does not come as a surprise. But as the other poster says, would you wnat to say your ring was from walmart, heck I don't recall the last time I bought anything from Walmart.

The company's HR policies need a drastic overhaul. Besides it's abig supporter of GWB - a big reason for the thumbs down for me :)

10:49 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah.i agree..i wouldn't buy a ring from Walmart.. on the other hand..i might not buy a ring from Target either...

Walmart has to shed its image if it wants to get higher income consumers into its stores.

But the question is..does it really need to ?

8:46 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Microsoft

Just when it looked like Google was spreading its wings across the internet, coming up with
beta applications that are hosted on the net rather than on your home computer, a business
model that seemed to drive a stake into the heart of Microsoft, the big gorilla fights back. Microsoft, smartly enough, has come up with a net presence of their own.

www.officelive.com

WHY MICROSOFT OFFICE LIVE?

A professional Web site, expertly hosted by Microsoft

A secure online workspace for organizing and managing customer and business information

A complete set of tools for managing time, tasks, projects, and company data that integrates with your existing Microsoft Office programs.

Now the battle begins. Let me know what you think.

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bill Gates has always been a follower. Now that Google has ambitious net plans, Microsoft is out trying to defend its turf.
They have always been followers.
They have been successful though.
It will be interesting to see what Google comes up with next to unsettle Microsoft.

10:13 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I liked the idea of MS coming up with the officelive. Many current users of office would be comfortable going with this if they are going to go the online hosted route.
But, remember that MS's biggest revenue source is the Office - would they be able to keep up those revenue levels after going online? It is not going to be a cakewalk, for sure. Microsoft is going to have to struggle to get their other businesses coming up to the rescue, which has not happened till now.
On the plus side, MS has enough cash so they can afford to give away services for free until the Office live catches on. I am sure Google is trying hard to figure out how to handle this Googly.

Recently I attended the Microsoft event on the release of Visual Studio, SQL server, etc.
The event was well planned and everything went smooth, well.. not Everything.
There were freebies, prizes, and the main reason for my attendance - free copies of the standard version software.
During the demo their software crashed many times, in front of the audience, showing the usual text message that the crash information could be sent to Microsoft for analysis - Send DoNotSend. The demonstrator made fun of it, saying 'it is now ready to ship!' and such, and the audience was too happy and applaused as the demonstrator quickly clicked on the Do Not Send button. It was fun.
I was inquiring about something to one of the Microsoft representatives. He explained me where on the web I could find that information, and also mentioned that I could google for the keyword so that.... Stop! Rewind..... rmation, and also mentioned that I could google for the keyword ...
I could not help but grin that a Microsoft representative would use that word, that too as a verb! Here is to Microsoft Live!

10:28 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out local.live.com. This is MS take on google maps and they have done a good job.

2:03 PM

 
Blogger brain freeze said...

Looks pretty cool..and effective too..
Bottom line, Google might be coming out with many initiaties, but the barrier to entry is low and Microsoft has the money and capability to capitalize on its late entry.
Google needs to find a space that it can dominate. Search engine..yes..everything else so far is a commodity as far as I am concerned.

8:58 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I liked the 'Locate Me' link and Push-pin on local.live.com
Still the map refresh is not as smooth as Google's, but of course it is just a matter of time.
MS has identified that there is enough interest in the market for these features, so now they are going after it with a vengence. Smart people! Their email live is also looking nice.
Bottom-line though is how MS could pull enough users to them, so that the Ad revenues reduction at Google could make a dent on their profitability.

Overall, WWW-on-beta is awesome for consumers!

8:50 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry, spelled my link wrong.

8:51 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pity that a company with the kind of resources Microsoft has, it still remains a follower, surely money should be able to hire some of the most creative brains out there.

Instead, it's a follower and then uses its might to crush companies started by creative entrepreneurs. In my lttle dream world, linux takes over to the eventual demise of Windows, and google rules the world :)

10:57 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pity that a company with the kind of resources Microsoft has, it still remains a follower, surely money should be able to hire some of the most creative brains out there.

Instead, it's a follower and then uses its might to crush companies started by creative entrepreneurs. In my lttle dream world, linux takes over to the eventual demise of Windows, and google rules the world :)

10:57 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ray Ozzie is the answer. He might be able to take microsoft forward..

Microsoft for a long time, by virtue of their business, have provided only back end applications..

Ray Ozzie has to bring Microsoft to the common consumer..it will be interesting to see how that happens..

Pocket PC, Intelligent watches..that kind of thing...

8:31 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Analyst: Xbox sales miss estimates


Pacific Northwest

Microsoft
Microsoft probably sold 1.3 million Xbox 360 video-game consoles since the introduction in November, missing analysts' estimates, Goldman, Sachs analyst Rick Sherlund said.

Sales may have reached 900,000 in North and South America, 300,000 in Europe and 100,000 in Asia, Sherlund said Tuesday in a note. That would fall short of Goldman's estimate of as many as 1.8 million units, he said.

The lag may indicate production problems, Sherlund said, adding that demand for the machine probably will outstrip supply for the next two quarters.

>>

Just a supply demand problem..

..not a demand problem alone ;-)

just an FYI

1:00 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check this out!
http://officelive.microsoft.com/WebHosting.aspx

8:56 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out this too!
http://news.com.com/2061-10805_3-6043260.html

9:25 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And then there was google..

Check out Google Finance - in Google style.

http://finance.google.com/finance?q=apple&btnG=Search

9:13 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For more details on Google Finance, check:
http://www.google.com/googlefinance/faq.html

9:15 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Google

In my opinion,Google is overpriced. Do they really have what it takes to be the company they are made out to be?
Granted that the momentum is with Google now, but are they strategically poised to take over?
Will Microsoft be sitting around and twiddling their thumbs ?

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Finally, on the blog bandwagon. Better late than never!!

3:00 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's only a matter of time before Google starts smoking their own dope...

10:14 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Google is overpriced. Should be heading down. Duck for cover guys.
Short this one. Its not worth losing sleep over it.

10:15 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Google is overpriced. Should be heading down. Duck for cover guys.
Short this one. Its not worth losing sleep over it.

10:15 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that Google should reach 600 not in the distant future. No, I did not smoke dope today.
Reasons:
There is yet to be a strong challenge for Google's Ad Revenues. Everytime you type google.com, google's music server at their private office plays 'cha-ching'.
Log in to hotmail, you will see some lousy big-letter block ads on the right side, that you won't even feel like clicking it. Do you remember seeing any ads when using Yahoo's email account? Me neither!

Google is already providing so many services for free, so MS is scratching its head to figure out how to attack them. MS cannot give away Ad service for free, there has to be enough people to glance at them.

Organizing the world's information has just started. The competition is going to be fierce, but Google has a huge advantage since the 2nd in line is limping.

So, why 500? Well, why 400 now? If you can explain that, then I would say that they are still growing at a similar pace, so 500 is not unreasonable. If you can comment and explain why it is overpriced, then you may wait for my reply :)

10:45 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Today google announced increasing its stake by 5% in AOL that shot up their stock by almost 8 points or 2%.

Seems like microsoft fell out of this Race they were already trying for an alliance with aol around thanksgiving timeframe.

1:29 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It appears that Microsoft did not want to invest in AOL. That was the reason for Time Warner going with Google. Given that AOL has been such a laggard in the recent past, this infusion of money ..from a short term point of view works well for Time Warner..
Google would have lost a lot of AOL had gone Microsoft's way. So it was in their interest to get this deal at any cost..
Doesn't hurt having a few billion lying around ;-)

8:34 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Google coming out with PC and operating system?

Check this out:

http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2006/01/are_google_pc_a.html

5:42 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here is some more spice..

Bear Stearns analysts speculated in a research report last month that consumers soon would see the "Google Cube," a small hardware box that could allow users to move songs, videos and other digital files between their computers and TV sets. Larry Page, Google's co-founder and president of products, will give a keynote address Friday at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. Analysts suspect Page will either show off a Google computing device or announce a partnership with a big retailer to sell such a machine.

1:06 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Google censors itself for China

Leading internet company Google has said it will censor its search services in China in order to gain greater access to China's fast-growing market.
Google has offered a Chinese-language version of its search engine for years but users have been frustrated by government blocks on the site.

The company is setting up a new site - Google.cn - which it will censor itself to satisfy the authorities in Beijing.

Google argued it would be more damaging to pull out of China altogether.

>> This is hot on the heals of another news item

Google, Feds Battle over Customer Info


Internet search giant Google Inc. confirmed Thursday that it is resisting a Bush administration request to review Google customer search habits.

The administration, via the U.S. Department of Justice, has asked Google for several days worth of activity at its main search site.

The million or so queries the government seeks are to serve as raw material to test the effectiveness of commercially-available Web content filters, according to legal documents seen by eWEEK.

The test results, plus an examination of how often a Google user encounters porn, will serve as evidence in an upcoming trial that could breath new life into a child online privacy law.


>> Double standard is what I call it..

All this after they promisingly said "do no evil" when they IPO'ed.

Hope they fall flat to the ground

1:48 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home